In a landmark judgment, the Federal High Court in Abuja has convicted Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed group Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), for issuing “sit-at-home” orders that paralyzed economic and social activities across Nigeria’s Southeast region. The court ruled these directives constituted “terrorist acts against Nigeria.”
The ruling was delivered by Justice James Omotosho, who emphasized that Kanu’s broadcasts—urging people to stay home every Monday—led to widespread closures of banks, schools, markets, petrol stations, and malls.
Key points from the trial:
- The court found prima facie evidence submitted by the Department of State Services (DSS) credible. Justice Omotosho previously dismissed Kanu’s “no-case” submission, ruling that the evidence warranted further explanation.
- Kanu refused to enter a defense, even after multiple adjournments, and was foreclosed from doing so by the court.
- The government alleged that Kanu’s public broadcasts threatened anyone who disobeyed the sit-at-home order, effectively inciting insurrection against the state.
- The sit-at-home campaign reportedly disrupted Southeast Nigeria’s economy, with many businesses and institutions complying with the orders and shutting down on Mondays.
- Though the original case dates back to 2015, the trial began anew in 2025 before Justice Omotosho.
The conviction marks a major development in Kanu’s long-running legal battles on charges of treasonable felony and terrorism. The judgment may have far-reaching implications for IPOB’s operations and posture in the region.
