Home Blog Page 388

Tinubu warmly embraces the PEPT verdict and encourages Obi and Atiku to prioritize the preservation of national unity

0

On Wednesday, Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu expressed his heightened determination and focus on realizing his vision of a united, peaceful, and prosperous nation in light of the recent judgment by the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal in Abuja.

Tinubu welcomes the Tribunal’s decision with a deep sense of responsibility and a commitment to serving all Nigerians, regardless of their diverse political affiliations, religious beliefs, or tribal backgrounds.

This was conveyed by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, in a statement titled ‘President Tinubu welcomes tribunal verdict and calls for collective efforts to build the nation.’

The President commended the diligence and professionalism of the five-member bench, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani, in interpreting the law.

He emphasized his dedication to upholding the rule of law and allowing the Tribunal to carry out its duties without hindrance, highlighting the positive progress of Nigeria’s legal system.

Tinubu also acknowledged that this development showcases the advancement of Africa’s largest democracy, particularly in a time when democratic systems are being tested in other parts of the continent.

Furthermore, he called upon his worthy opponents to inspire their supporters to prioritize patriotism over partisan interests, supporting the government in its efforts to enhance the lives of all Nigerians.

In closing, President Tinubu expressed gratitude to Nigerians for entrusting him with the mandate to lead the country, promising to not only meet but exceed their expectations through diligent hard work alongside his dedicated team.

This, he believes, will be achieved by the grace of God Almighty.

UNILAG lecturer to be brought to court by police on charges of alleged rape.

0

A female undergraduate student, whose identity remains confidential, has leveled an accusation of sexual assault against a lecturer known as Dr. Kadiri at the University of Lagos, Akoka.

The student alleged that the incident transpired during her visit to the lecturer’s office to address concerns regarding her academic results.

Rather than addressing the student’s academic issues, the Inclusive Social Welfare and Empowerment Foundation, a non-governmental organization to which the victim reported the incident, claims that the lecturer allegedly raped her on August 16, 2023.

In response, InclusiveSWEF reported the case to the Gender Unit of the state police command.

The state’s Commissioner of Police, Idowu Owohunwa, subsequently issued a warrant for the lecturer’s arrest through the state High Court, involving the Vice Chancellor of the university in the process.

Confirming the incident, the state Police Public Relations Officer, Benjamin Hundeyin, stated, “He is scheduled to appear in court in the upcoming days.”

In a reaction statement, the spokesperson for UNILAG, Adejoke Alaga-Ibraheem, acknowledged that the university was aware of an ongoing investigation concerning one of its employees.

She stated, “UNILAG Management received a letter from the Nigeria Police Force on August 28, inviting an employee of the university for questioning. The employee promptly complied on August 29.

While we are not yet privy to the full details of the incident leading to the employee’s arrest, we are fully aware that the investigation is ongoing, and we are collaborating with security agencies to ensure a just resolution of the matter.”

Breaking News: Tribunal Rejects Atiku and PDP’s Challenge to Tinubu’s Election Victory.

0

The Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Abubakar Atiku, faced a significant setback on Wednesday in his effort to challenge the election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

The Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) dismissed several paragraphs of Atiku’s petition that were crucial to his attempt to remove Tinubu from office.

Furthermore, the Court rejected numerous pieces of evidence, including witness statements, that Atiku had presented to support his claims of irregularities and malpractices in the February 25 presidential election.

In his ruling on objections presented by Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) on behalf of Tinubu, Justice Moses Ugoh determined that several parts of Atiku’s petition lacked a sufficient legal basis and were, therefore, deemed incompetent.

Similarly to the case of the Labour Party’s Presidential candidate, Mr. Peter Obi, the Court noted that Atiku had failed to provide essential facts needed to support his petition.

Among the shortcomings, Atiku did not specify where ballot boxes were allegedly snatched, how the Bimodal Voters Accreditation System (BVAS) machine was manipulated, or the names of polling booths where malpractices were purported to occur.

Despite claiming to have received the majority of lawful votes, Atiku did not clearly state the total lawful votes he alleged to have garnered.

Furthermore, while he asserted that Tinubu did not secure a majority of lawful votes, he did not disclose the number of perceived lawful votes in his petition.

The court also found fault with Atiku for making serious allegations against Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello, and the Chairman of Olamaboro Local Government of Kogi State, Friday Adejoh, without including them as respondents in the petition.

This omission was deemed fatal to the petition as it denied the accused individuals the opportunity to defend themselves, as required by law.

The court dismissed allegations of over-voting across Nigeria, as the specific locations of the alleged over-voting were not specified in the petition.

Atiku’s introduction of new facts and allegations in an unconventional manner was criticized for catching the respondents off guard and being unfair.

Additionally, Atiku’s petition was faulted for introducing allegations of criminal conviction, certificate forgery, and dual citizenship of Guinea against Tinubu outside the accepted mode of filing a petition.

Justice Stephen Jonah Adah, in another ruling on objections against the petition, removed several documents presented by Atiku because they were created during the course of the petition.

Furthermore, the evidence of several key witnesses for Atiku was expunged from the Court record for not adhering to legal requirements.

The court attributed the striking out of several paragraphs of the petition to the improper construction of the petition by the PDP’s presidential candidate, which rendered them lacking in merit.

Comprehensive Compilation: Nominees for the 2023 Men’s Ballon d’Or

0

Lionel Messi and Erling Haaland stand out as strong contenders for this year’s prestigious Ballon d’Or award, while the women’s category features Spain’s World Cup sensation, Aitana Bonmati, leading the list of nominees announced on Wednesday.

Messi, who recently made a move from Paris Saint-Germain to Inter Miami, has a significant chance to secure his eighth Ballon d’Or win in a remarkable career, especially after leading Argentina to World Cup triumph in Qatar last year.

Haaland emerges as a formidable rival for the award, having netted an impressive 52 goals in 53 games, contributing significantly to Manchester City’s historic treble victory in the Champions League, Premier League, and FA Cup last season.

He also claimed the UEFA Player of the Year Award just last week.

Among the 30 nominees for the award, we also find PSG’s Kylian Mbappe and Haaland’s Manchester City teammate, Kevin De Bruyne. The winner of this prestigious accolade will be revealed at a ceremony in Paris scheduled for October 30.

For a comprehensive list of the nominees:

– André Onana – Manchester United/Cameroon
– Josko Gvardiol – Manchester City/Croatia
– Karim Benzema – Al Ittihad
– Jamal Musiala – Bayern Munich/Germany
– Mohamed Salah – Liverpool/Egypt
– Jude Bellingham – Real Madrid/England
– Bukayo Saka – Arsenal/England
– Randal Kolo Muani – Paris Saint-Germain/France
– Kevin De Bruyne – Manchester City/Belgium
– Bernardo Silva – Manchester City/Portugal
– Emiliano Martínez – Aston Villa/Argentina
– Khvicha Kvaratskhelia – Napoli/Georgia
– Rúben Dias – Manchester City/Portugal
– Nicolo Barella – Inter Milan/Italy
– Erling Haaland – Manchester City/Norway
– Yassine Bounou – Al Hilal/Morocco
– Martin Ødegaard – Arsenal/Norway
– Julián Álvarez – Manchester City/Argentina
– Ilkay Gündogan – Barcelona/Germany
– Vinícius Júnior – Real Madrid/Brazil
– Lionel Messi – Inter Miami/Argentina
– Rodri – Manchester City/Spain
– Lautaro Martínez – Inter Milan/Argentina
– Antoine Griezmann – Atletico Madrid/France
– Robert Lewandowski – Barcelona/Poland
– Kylian Mbappé – Paris Saint-Germain/France
– Kim Min-Jae – Napoli/South Korea
– Victor Osimhen – Napoli/Nigeria
– Luka Modric – Real Madrid/Croatia
– Harry Kane – Bayern Munich/England

 

Breaking News: LP Refuses to Accept Tribunal’s Decision

0

The leadership of the Labour Party has vehemently rejected the verdict handed down by the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal on Wednesday.

This decision came shortly after the tribunal, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani, dismissed the petitions filed by LP lawyers, characterizing them as mere rhetoric.

The petitioners had put forth several claims, including challenging the declaration of Tinubu as the election winner due to his failure to secure 25 per cent of the vote in the FCT, questioning Tinubu’s eligibility to run following a forfeiture in the United States, and alleging that the Independent National Electoral Commission failed to transmit election results to its viewer platform, among other grievances.

In response, the National Publicity Secretary of LP, Obiora Ifoh, released a statement in Abuja, adamantly expressing the party’s refusal to accept the tribunal’s judgment.

He called for calm among their supporters and hinted at consultations with their legal team to determine the party’s next course of action.

Ifoh stated, “The Labour Party watched with profound disappointment the dismissal of our petitions by the five-member panel of the Presidential Election Petition Court, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani.

We wholeheartedly reject the entire judgment, asserting that it failed to deliver justice and did not align with the law or the people’s wishes.

Nigerians bore witness to the electoral irregularities on February 25, 2023, which received international condemnation. Regrettably, the Tribunal did not acknowledge these concerns.

What’s at stake here is democracy, and we will persist until the will of the people prevails.

We applaud the unwavering dedication of our legal team, who fearlessly exposed the flaws in our system. While we mourn for the state of democracy in Nigeria, we refuse to abandon our commitment to the nation.

We will provide further details of our party’s stance following consultations with our lawyers after obtaining the Certified True Copy of the judgment.

We urge all democracy enthusiasts to remain resolute and optimistic because a renewed Nigeria remains attainable.”

The Tribunal commences the deliberation of Atiku and PDP’s petition for judgment.

0

The Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal, currently convened in Abuja, is poised to announce its verdict regarding the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential nominee from the February 25, 2023 elections, which was lodged against President Bola Tinubu.

Justice Moses Ugo, one of the five justices on the panel, is presently in the process of articulating the key matters to be addressed in this petition.

Further information will be provided in due course.

Chronological Overview of Presidential Election Petitions in Nigeria Since 1999

0

Elections in Nigeria have been marked by controversy, violence, and subsequent petitions since the country transitioned to civilian rule in 1999, following its first democratic election since the 1993 military takeover.

The Court of Appeal, which serves as the official election petition tribunal for presidential elections, is where petitions challenging election outcomes are lodged.

The procedure for the election petition tribunal is detailed in the First Schedule of the Electoral Act 2022.

Notably, the Allied Peoples Movement, the Peoples Democratic Party, and the Labour Party, along with their respective presidential candidates, have jointly submitted a petition to the tribunal in an effort to reverse the election victory of President Bola Tinubu in the 2023 presidential election.

Anticipation surrounds the forthcoming verdict of the Presidential Election Petition Court, expected to be delivered today at the Court of Appeal in the Three Arms Zone of Abuja.

This report by PUNCH examines past presidential election petitions in Nigeria since 1999.

1999: Falae vs Obasanjo

Nigeria conducted its presidential elections on February 27, 1999, marking the start of the Fourth Nigerian Republic and the first election since the 1993 military takeover.

Olusegun Obasanjo of the People’s Democratic Party emerged victorious, defeating Olu Falae, who ran on a joint ticket supported by the Alliance for Democracy and the All People’s Party.

Dissatisfied with the results, Falae contested Obasanjo’s victory as declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission, filing a suit at the Court of Appeal in Abuja.

However, on April 19, 1999, Justice Dahiru Musdapher delivered a verdict that found “The petition lacks merit and ought to be dismissed.”

2003: Buhari vs Obasanjo

General Muhammadu Buhari, the presidential candidate of the All Nigeria Peoples Party, filed a case contesting President Olusegun Obasanjo’s 2003 re-election.

However, the case was denied by the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja. Buhari alleged that Obasanjo’s re-election was unconstitutional due to corruption, disregard for the Electoral Act of 2002, and ineligibility to run for office at the time of the election.

Buhari pursued the case to the Supreme Court, but the apex court upheld the Tribunal’s earlier ruling.

2007: Buhari and Atiku vs Yar’Adua

Despite widespread claims that the results did not meet international standards, Umaru Yar’Adua emerged victorious in the fiercely contested presidential election.

Atiku Abubakar and Muhammadu Buhari challenged the election in court, but the Supreme Court ultimately affirmed Yar’Adua’s victory.

2011: Buhari vs Jonathan

In the presidential election of April 16, 2011, Buhari, representing the Congress for Progressive Change, attempted to overturn President Goodluck Jonathan’s victory after the Supreme Court declared him the winner.

2019: Atiku vs Buhari

The primary candidates in the 2019 presidential election were Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party and incumbent President Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress.

Following an election year devoid of legal challenges, the Court of Appeal upheld Buhari’s re-election in a ruling on September 11, 2019.

On October 30, 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Atiku’s case.

2023: Obi and Atiku vs Tinubu

The 2023 presidential election witnessed Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party and Peter Obi of the Labour Party challenging the Independent National Electoral Commission’s declaration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress as the nation’s next president.

Atiku claimed that this was the worst election since Nigeria returned to democracy in 1999 and contested the results.

Peter Obi also disagreed with the outcome and submitted a petition challenging Tinubu’s designation as the winner of the presidential election held on February 25.

Either party has the option to appeal to the Supreme Court if dissatisfied with the tribunal’s decision, which serves as the highest appellate body with a final say in the matter.

Efforts to repatriate 61 undocumented migrants apprehended in Ogun through immigration procedures.

0

The Comptroller of the Nigeria Immigration Service for Ogun State Command, Bosede Olayemisi, has officially verified the apprehension of 62 undocumented migrants, consisting of 61 individuals from Cameroon and one from Burkina Faso.

Olayemisi stated that these individuals will be returned to their respective countries within this week.

The Immigration Service took action based on intelligence received from the Lagos Zonal Command, apprehending these illegal migrants in the Obafemi-Owode Local Government Area, specifically around Ibafo and Asese.

Olayemisi disclosed this information during a press conference held on Tuesday at the Immigration state command headquarters in Oke-Mosan, Abeokuta.

She explained, “Last week, our Zonal Command in Lagos reported the arrest of a Cameroonian who was attempting to obtain a Nigerian passport.

He claimed to reside in Ibafo and later confessed that many others like him were living between Ibafo and Sagamu.

Consequently, our officers were deployed, resulting in the arrest of 33 individuals in Ibafo.

Subsequently, we received information that some of them frequently gathered in Asese, Mowe, leading to the apprehension of an additional 28 Cameroonians and one Burkinabe.”

“The detainees repeatedly mentioned two individuals, Terrace, a Cameroonian, and Peter, a Nigerian, who played central roles in this illegal activity.

As part of our investigation, we have detained two Nigerians to assist with inquiries.

Preparations are already underway for their repatriation, as they are considered illegal migrants who entered the country without proper authorization.

Their presence poses a significant security risk and constitutes an unlawful entity within our nation.”

Furthermore, Olayemisi noted that the Cameroonian migrants claimed they were enticed to come to Nigeria with the promise of employment opportunities.

Shettima: Tribunal Emphasizes that Candidate Qualifications and Disqualifications are Pre-Election Issues

0

The Presidential Petition Election Tribunal, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani and composed of five members, declared on Wednesday that the Allied Peoples Movement’s petition, which contested Vice President Kashim Shettima’s qualification, pertained to a pre-election issue.

Tsammani, while delivering the verdict, emphasized that such matters should have been raised prior to the presidential election.

He stated, “Determining qualifications or disqualifications is a constitutional matter, and it falls under the category of pre-election issues.

It must be resolved prior to the election’s commencement.

This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this matter, and even if it did, it would be considered time-barred due to its pre-election nature.”

Beforehand, Justice Tsammani announced that the tribunal would issue judgments separately for each of the petitions, with priority given to petition number four.

The Allied Peoples Movement had filed this petition, challenging Vice President Kashim Shettima’s qualifications, among other issues.”

The Tribunal rejects APM’s petition challenging Tinubu and Shettima.

0

The Presidential Election Petition Court has dismissed the petitions filed by the Allied Peoples Movement against President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima, citing a lack of merit.

The PEPC not only rejected APM’s attempt to nullify Tinubu’s election but also described their case as “incompetent.”

According to the court, the issues raised by APM in their petition pertain to pre-election matters that fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court.

Justice Haruna Tsammani, the panel’s chairman, delivered this ruling.

Furthermore, the tribunal also rejected APM’s petition against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and four others, including the All Progressives Congress, Bola Tinubu, Kashim Shettima, and Kabiru Masari.

Justice Tsammani examined each of APM’s arguments and found them lacking merit.

The judge also upheld the preliminary objections raised by all the respondents regarding the competence of the petition.

Tsammani pointed out that since the petition revolved around the eligibility of Tinubu to contest the presidential election, APM should have taken their case to court within 14 days after Tinubu’s nomination by the APC.

Additionally, he noted that the law does not permit one political party to challenge the nomination process of another party’s candidate.

Furthermore, Tsammani clarified that an invalid or double nomination does not serve as grounds for disqualification in presidential elections, as specified in sections 131 and 137 of the Constitution.